There is so much to be learned from every corner of the Torah; even from letters that aren’t there but logically should be there. Case in point, found in this week’s Torah portion of Bamidbar, the Baal HaTurim makes an interesting observation regarding when the Torah enumerates each tribe. The tribes were set up into 4 units on each side of the Mishkan, and the leading tribe of each side were mentioned first with its census and then it says “and those with them ‘this tribe etc.'” “and ‘that tribe etc.'” But between the tribe of Yissachar and Zevulun the word “and” was not used to differentiate between those two tribes.
The Baal HaTurim (2:7) says “[The Torah states] ‘tribe of Zevulun’ and did not say ‘and the tribe’ as it said by all the other ones, because Zevulun financially supported Yissachar (See Breishis Rabba 99:9). And I saw in the Medrish Tanchuma (not found in our editions) the reason why it doesn’t say “and the tribe of Zevulun” as it says by all the [other tribes] is because it is coming to teach you that Zevulun was involved in business and would feed Yissachar [who was involved in Torah learning] therefore the pasuk did not make him (Zevulun) look like he is subordinate to him (Yissachar), like saying his (Zevulun) reward is only as great as his (Yissachar). So to it says in Mishley (3:18) ‘It’s a tree of life to those who grasp it, and its supporters are praiseworthy.’ It also writes in Koheles (7:12) ‘For the shade of wisdom is within the shade of money’, therefore they were mentioned within one tribe as if it says, ‘Yissachar the tribe of Zevulun’.” (Click here for Hebrew text.)
The famous Yissachar and Zevulun relationship. The tribe of Zevulun lived by the seaports in the Land of Israel and were successful businessmen. They also supported the tribe of Yissachar, who were known to be sitting and learning Torah all day, delving into the depths and profundities of Hashem’s handbook for mankind, which is the blueprints of creation. On a simple and logical level this seems to mean that there was a “pact” made that Zevulun would get an equal amount of reward for Yissachar’s Torah study, for without Zevulun’s support Yissachar could not have put a full effort into their studies. This is no small thing, as Chaza”l famously say that learning Torah is equated to all the other mitzvos (תלמוד תורה כנגד כולם). Just to paint a picture of how much reward even learning one word of Torah is, the Alter of Kelm said that it is worth it for all the pain and suffering that is experienced in birthing and raising a child and then whatever pain and suffering that child goes through as he grows up and goes through life until the day he dies just so that he can answer “baruch Hu umvaruch Shmo” even just once. And saying “amen,” even just once in one’s lifetime, is one thousand times better than “baruch Hu umvaruch Shmo.” Answering “amen yehei Shmei rabba umivorach…” is a thousand times greater than answering “amen,” and one Torah saying is one thousand times greater than a “amen yehei Shmei Rabba etc.” (See Shma Bni, by Rav Binyamin Luban note 570).
Now imagine hours and hours of learning per day how much reward that must be? Unfathomable!! Yet the Baal HaTurim says that one who supports Torah isn’t getting the reward of the Torah learners he is supporting. Why not? It seems unconceivably vast and worthwhile?
It would seem that Hashem wanted the supporters of Torah to not feel subordinate to the Torah learners, but rather the support of Torah learning is independently rewarded for doing just that, supporting Torah. That mitzvah by itself has its own value, which might even be on par if not in a sense greater than the reward for Torah learning. As the famous pasuk quoted in Mishlei, which we say whenever we put back the Torah, concludes: “and its supporters are praiseworthy.” Whereas by those who learn Torah, the beginning of the pasuk only says “It is a Tree of Life to those who grasp it.” If anything, it’s even possibly inferable from the end of the Baal HaTurim that the Torah learners are subordinate in a sense to their supporters, as he concludes that the Torah should be read as if they are one tribe, “Yissachar the tribe of Zevulun,” under Zevulun’s banner.
Praiseworthy are the supporters of Torah! This is something great to think about after seeing a glimpse how precious Torah learning is!